Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John R. Nichols, and Irene Nichols v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., Jimmie John Miller, Jr., and Jolain Miller v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., 92-5133 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 92-5133 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 17, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 995 F.2d 85 John R. NICHOLS, and Irene Nichols, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Jimmie John MILLER, Jr., and Jolain Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-5133 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Aug. 17, 1993. M. Terrance Hoychick, Young, Hoychick & Aguillard, Eunice, LA, for Miller, et al. Kenneth H. Laborde, Mary Garvey Algero, Pulaksi, Gieger & Laborde, New Orlean
More

995 F.2d 85

John R. NICHOLS, and Irene Nichols, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INC., et al., Defendants.
Jimmie John MILLER, Jr., and Jolain Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-5133
Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1993.

M. Terrance Hoychick, Young, Hoychick & Aguillard, Eunice, LA, for Miller, et al.

Kenneth H. Laborde, Mary Garvey Algero, Pulaksi, Gieger & Laborde, New Orleans, LA, for defendant/defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Nauman S. Scott, Judge.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

While no motion for rehearing was filed in this case, another member of our court has questioned the propriety of disposition of this case on the summary calendar and requested the clerk to hold the issuance of any mandate in this case. While the panel adheres to its original view that this case was appropriate for summary calendar disposition, we also recognize that the concerns expressed by our colleague are reasonable, and that the appropriate course to follow when reasonable doubts are raised is to permit reconsideration which would eliminate those doubts.

2

Accordingly, we withdraw the opinion dated July 14, 1993, 995 F.2d 82; and instruct the clerk to withdraw the mandate issued herein; and classify this case as III for further consideration by an oral argument panel.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer